What survives the burning

There's a question you don't ask at Manikarnika. You sit, you watch, and the question asks itself.

If none of it goes onto the bamboo — the degrees, the savings, the years of trying — then why try? Why earn the degree, save the money, spend the years? The family walks away when the fire's hot and the wood is gone, and tomorrow someone else is on the same spot. So what was any of it for?

The first time the question hit me, I was sitting on a step at maybe two in the morning. I didn't have an answer. I'm not sure I have one even now. But I've been chewing on it for four years and a few things have settled.

The first answer

There's a kind of person who hears that question and stops.

He stops getting up early. He stops trying to be good at things. He stops wanting. He becomes very still, and he believes the stillness is the whole answer. The Aghora, in the strict sense, has chosen to live inside the question. He sits. He prays. He sees things most people don't. Some of them, I'm told, protect places from things you and I can't see. Some of them.

Other men sit in the same cloth, in the same posture, and the only thing they're protecting is their next collection. Both exist. Varanasi teaches you to notice the difference quickly.

So even the "just sit" answer is not as clean as it looks.

A longer view

Then I started reading the Bhagavad Gita more carefully, and a stranger thought started forming.

The Gita doesn't describe a backward, primitive world. It describes one with weapons so powerful that whole armies vanish in a flash. Knowledge so deep that masters move continents in a thought. The world it remembers was, in some way, more advanced than ours. Not less.

And then — by the same telling — that world destroyed itself. Or laws were passed to suppress what was too dangerous to keep. Or natural disasters ate the libraries. Or the transcripts were burned. And the people who came after had to start from almost nothing again. The cycle repeated. It keeps repeating.

If this is even half true, the question at Manikarnika gets sharper, not softer.

We are not the first civilization standing here. We are not the last. Whatever we build — our pipelines, our medicines, our satellites, our constitutions — has some likelihood of being erased the way an earlier round of all of it was erased. Not just our bodies on the bamboo. Our whole era on a bamboo too. Long enough timescale and the river is collective.

And yet

So why build anything, when both the body and the era are temporary?

I think I have a working answer. It's not the only answer and might not be the right one. It's mine for now.

Yes, eras rise and fall. Yes, bodies go. And in the middle, while the era is still standing, what you do for the people in front of you is the most real thing there is.

Whoever wants to rule and crush will take the land if the rest of us sit. This has happened. It keeps happening. Every quiet place that ever got eaten was eaten because the quiet place forgot to build. The freedom fighters — they didn't sit. The teachers in small schoolrooms — they didn't sit. The unsung municipal engineer who, in 1923, ran a clean water line into a slum on the wrong side of the city — he didn't sit. The child who drank that water and lived to grow up — that's the answer.

The hospital outlives the doctor. The bridge outlives the engineer. The poem outlives the poet. Even if the whole civilization gets reset, the child who lived because of the work lived. That counted. That can't be taken back, even by a comet.

What I'm trying to learn

Here is what I'm actually trying to learn, the part that's harder.

I'm trying to hold the Aghora's clarity about endings and the builder's seriousness about middles, at the same time, in the same chest, without one cancelling the other.

When I sit down to write a pipeline at work, I want to do it the way a builder builds. Like it matters. Like the families on the other end of the data, whoever they are, deserve to not have their thing break at three in the morning.

When I close the laptop, I want to remember the bamboo. So that the win at work doesn't make me bigger than I am, and the loss doesn't make me smaller.

I'm not very good at this yet. Some weeks the office light wins and I forget the river. Other weeks the river wins and I miss a deadline I should have hit. The two halves are still arguing.

But the question — what survives the burning? — at least has a candidate answer now.

The thing you made for someone else.

It might not survive the cycle. It might. But while there is still an era to live inside, while the wood is still warm and the fire is still up, that's the only thing I've found that's worth getting up for.

← Back to blog